History of Medicine Week: 100 years later… Looking Back on the First World War and the Spanish Influenza October 22-26th

By Kelly Salman (Meds 2021)

The What Happened in Medicine (WHIM) Historical Society is proud to host the fourth annual History of Medicine Week! This year’s theme highlights a significant anniversary for both medicine and the world. A century ago in 1918, two major and interconnected events in history occurred: the Spanish flu and WWI. Learn more about what happened in medicine then and consider how things have (or haven’t) changed in our present day 2018 — 100 years later…

Students, Faculty, and Community members are all welcome to attend.

Museum of Health Care Showcase

Monday October 22nd, 8:30am-3:30pm

New Medical Building Grande Corridor, 15 Arch St.

Many of our greatest medical technologies and advancements have come out of times of crisis. Come and peruse a sampling of century-old artifacts from both the Spanish Flu and WWI. Curated by the Museum of Healthcare.


Speaker Panel Followed by Wine and Cheese Reception

Tuesday October 23rd, 5:30-8:00pm

Speaker panel: New Medical Building, Rm 132 A, 5:30-7:00pm

Reception: Museum of Healthcare, 7:00-8:00pm

 

“We Forgot to Remember – young Canadians commemorating the stories of the 1918 Pandemic”

Award-winning Neil Orford will discuss the Spanish Flu and its impact in medicine.

 

“Brock Chisholm and the Legacy of War Trauma”

Military historians Dr. Robert Engen and Matthew Barrett will discuss the trauma of war through their research on the experiences of Lt. Brock Chisholm in the first world war before he became a physician and the first director general of the WHO. Dr. Engen and Mr. Barrett created a graphic novel to illustrate this narrative, as featured in the Queen’s Alumni Review this summer: https://www.queensu.ca/gazette/alumnireview/stories/battle-hill-70

 About the Speakers:

In 2017, Neil Orford retired from teaching History at Centre Dufferin District High School in Shelburne, ON. His work as a teacher has seen him win numerous awards for his teaching, most recently the 2015 Government of Canada History Award for Teaching; as well as the prestigious 2013 Canadian Governor General’s Award for History Teaching and the 2012 Ontario Premier’s Award for Teaching Excellence. In July 2013, Neil Orford founded a consulting business, Canadian Historical Educational Services, Ltd. to assist school boards, museums, non-profits & government agencies with designing educational programs for historical thinking and commemoration. This work has led him to consultation work with the Federal Ministry of Canadian Heritage in 2017, helping to design digital commemorations for students across Canada.

Dr. Robert Engen, MA’08, PhD’14 (History) is an assistant professor of history at Royal Military College and an adjunct professor in the Department of History at Queen’s. He is the author of Canadians Under Fire: Infantry Effectiveness in the Second World War and Strangers in Arms: Combat Motivation in the Canadian Army, 1943–1945, both published by McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Matthew Barrett is an SSHRC-funded PhD candidate in the Department of History at Queen’s. His doctoral research examines the concepts of honour and dishonour within military culture. In particular, he studies the dismissal and cashiering of Canadian officers during both World Wars. Additional research focuses on Canadian public and institutional attitudes toward suicide in the military. His academic work has appeared in Canadian Military Journal, Canadian Military History, Journal of Canadian Studies and British Journal of Canadian Studies. He has also illustrated two First World War graphic novels with Robert Engen.


Trivia Night

Friday October 26th, 7:00-9:00pm

The Grad Club, 162 Barrie St.

 Impress your friends with your history know-how during a historically themed Trivia Night! Snacks will be provided!

 

 

 

Posted on

MD Program Executive Committee Meeting Highlights: September 18, 2018

By Jennifer Saunders

Faculty and staff interested in attending MD PEC meetings, should contact the Committee Secretary (Orser, Faye A. <Faye.Orser@kingstonhsc.ca>) for information relating to agenda items and meeting schedules.

UPDATE: 

The following revised Policies and Terms of Reference were discussed and approved by the Committee but require final approval by SOMAC.

  • Student Assessment Policy Revisions
  • QuARMS Admission Process
  • MD Program Progress & Promotion Committee TOR
  • P&P Policy and Student Professionalism Policy
  • MD Program Professionalism Advisory Committee TOR

The following policy was approved by the Committee:

  • The Attendance and Absences in Undergraduate Medical Education Policy
    • Supersedes: Policy #SA-07 v3

This policy is effective October 1, 2018.

All Undergraduate Medical Education policies and terms of reference are available on the UGME website:  https://meds.queensu.ca/academics/undergraduate/policies-committees

 

Posted on

Fourth Annual Pap Party event set for October 15-18

By Lauren Wilson (MEDS 2019, Katherine Rabicki (MEDS 2019), Ariba Shah (MEDS 2020) and Hayley Manlove (MEDS 2021)

The fourth annual Pap Party event will take place October 15-18th, during Cervical Cancer Awareness week. This is an event which runs free pap smear clinics, specifically intending to reach women who may not have access to cervical cancer screening otherwise and to increase awareness of Human Papilloma Virus in the community.

In 2015, Cancer Care Ontario estimated that 26% of screen eligible women were overdue for their pap smear. Ensuring adequate access to all women and minimizing barriers to receiving screening are crucial; a Pap Party priority. In 2017, across all four clinic dates, 30 women received pap smears through the Pap Party campaign.

Women aged 21-70 who have not had a pap smear in the last three years are welcome. To increase accessibility to cervical cancer screening, women without primary care physicians, with or without a valid health card are also encouraged to attend the Pap Party Event.

The clinics are run by a team of medical students, residents and physicians under the guidance of Dr. Julie Francis and Dr. Hugh Langley and in collaboration with the Federation of Medical Women of Canada (FMWC). The first Pap Party in 2015 took place in Kingston and has since grown to offer clinics in Belleville, Napanee, and Tyendinaga as well.

The 2018 Pap Party schedule is :

Monday October 15 5:30pm – 7:30pm: HPE Public Health, Belleville

Tuesday October 16 5:30pm – 7:30pm: Community Well Being Centre, Tyendinaga, Mohawk Territory

Wednesday October 17 5:30pm – 7:30pm: Kingston Health Science Centre, Burr 1, Kingston

Thursday October 18 5:30pm – 7:30pm: Kingston Community Health Center, Napanee

To expand Pap Party further and combat declining cervical cancer screening rates, we have also reached out to all primary care clinics in the Kingston area encouraging them to host their own pap smear clinics during Cervical Cancer Awareness Week. They will also be encouraged to offer the HPV Vaccine. Clinics that register with the FMWC receive a kit that includes a tip sheet, colour poster, news release template, and patient education brochures. To register your clinic and contribute to reducing cervical cancer rates, please visit https://fmwc.ca/events/pap-campaign/.

The FMWC website also has more information for individuals and will help them find a registered clinic nearby.

Thank you taking the time to learn about the Pap Party initiative. Please feel free to contact us if you would like any additional information and please spread information about the Pap Party event to women in your life! We would be grateful and thrilled!

Posted on

Medical Student Research Showcase September 20

By Drs. Heather Murray & Melanie Walker

This year the School of Medicine is proud to invite you to the 7th annual Medical Student Research Showcase on Thursday September 20, 2018.

This event celebrates the research achievements of our undergraduate medical students, with both posters and an oral plenary session featuring research performed by students while they have been enrolled in medical school. All students who received summer studentship research funding through the School of Medicine in 2018 will be presenting their work, as well as many other research initiatives. The posters will be displayed in the David Walker Atrium of the School of Medicine building from 8 am until 5 pm, with the students standing at their posters answering questions between 10:30 and noon.

The oral plenary features the top research projects selected by a panel of faculty judges, and will run in room 132A from noon until 1:30 pm on September 20, immediately following the poster session Q&A.

This year’s faculty judges included:

Dr. Stephen Pang

Dr. Sheela Abraham

Dr. Nishardi Wijeratne

Dr. Faiza khurshid

Dr. Graeme Smith

Dr. Olga Bougie

Dr. Susan Crocker

Dr. Michael Rauh

Dr. Prameet Sheth

Dr. Yuka Asai

Dr. Thiwanka Wijeratne

Dr. Jennifer Flemming

Dr. Anne Ellis

Dr. Tim Phillips

We are very grateful to these faculty members for evaluating our oral plenary applicants this year.

The three students who have been selected for the oral plenary session, and the titles of their research presentations and faculty supervisor names are listed below. Each of these three students will receive The Albert Clark Award for Medical Student Research Excellence.

Harry Chandrakumaran – Inter-Laboratory Variability Of Parathyroid Hormone: impact on clinical decision-making
Sachin Pasricha – Clinical indications associated with opioid initiation for pain management in Ontario, Canada: A population-based cohort study
Rachel Oh – Evaluation of ARHGAP33 missense alleles in a zebrafish model of childhood glaucoma

Please set aside some time to attend the Medical Student Research Showcase on September 20th. The students will appreciate your interest and support, and you will be amazed at what they have been able to achieve.

 

 

Posted on

Diversity matters in undergraduate medical education. Not because it’s an accreditation standard (although it is, encompassing several aspects of the very broad concept of diversity), but because our students, classrooms, and faculty should reflect the populations of our communities and country.

As part of this, we believe students should see people like themselves reflected in who is at the front of the classroom and in clinics and other settings: As educators, as role models, as future colleagues.

One key aspect of diversity is gender and gender roles. Recently, Dr. Stephen Archer, head of Queen’s Department of Medicine, shared a post on his monthly blog on the role of women in medicine, and in his department here at Queen’s. We’re reposting it here because of its important message.

Women in Medicine: Where are we 150 years after Dr. Emily Howard Stowe, Canada’s First Female Physician?

By Dr. Stephen Archer

In 2016 I commissioned the creation of a Women in Medicine (WIM) Program in the Department of Medicine at Queen’s University. I was inspired to do so by a variety of factors including a diversity and equity course I had taken, some personal reflection on the subject of feminism, conversation with female colleagues, and my observations that the state of WIM would best be evaluated and advanced by women themselves. Launching this program felt like a positive step to enhance diversity and equity, promote professional development and perhaps even contribute to physician wellness.

Dr. Emily Howard Stowe (née Jennings)

There were those at the time, including some female physicians I consulted, who felt we did not need a WIM program. In our Alternate Funding Plan (AFP – which is our payment structure) we have pay equity, many women in leadership positions, and half of our Divisional Chairs are female (as just a few examples). Additionally, more than half the medical student class at Queen’s University is female. Therefore, some may ask, why do we need a WIM program?  Having continued to hear stories of discrimination and challenges to advancement that were perceived to be based on gender, and in discussion with my fellow Heads of Medicine at CAPM (Canadian Association of Professors of Medicine), it was ascertained that many gender differences remain and these should be addressed head on. Most obvious is the unique female role in reproduction and child rearing during early years in a woman’s career, in particular. However, there are other less intuitive differences I encountered. For example, while every female physician seems to know what “imposter syndrome” is, few male physicians were aware of this condition (a psychological pattern in which an individual doubts their accomplishments, and has a persistent internalized fear of being exposed as a “fraud”- despite being fully competent!). While imposter syndrome occurs in both women and men it seems more on the minds of female physicians in my nonscientific survey….and that’s but one of many differences.

Next, I considered how best to proceed with the idea that we should create a WIM program. I knew just enough to know that this was something I should not attempt to lead or direct! Rather, I turned for guidance to my friend and colleague (and Associate Head of Equity and Diversity in the Department), Dr. Mala Joneja. After discussion she agreed to help start a WIM program (but more on that later).

A proper discussion of WIM programs should start at the beginning. There is a very relevant biography in the archives of Canadian Medical history that is worth a quick review. Let’s go back 150 years and meet Canada’s first female physician, Dr. Emily Howard Stowe (née Jennings). Her story of overcoming adversity and of her interactions with male detractors and supporters remains relevant today.  She was born in Norwich, Ontario on May 1, 1831. By 1854 she graduated from Normal School and became Principal at Brantford Public School. Believe it or not this was a first in Canada!

Dr. Clemence Sophia Lozier and the New York Medical College for Women

Emily married John Stowe who unfortunately contracted tuberculosis. Reportedly inspired by this adversity she decided to change careers and become a physician. Just one problem: this had never occurred in Canada and was apparently impossible!  In 1865, her application to the Toronto School of Medicine was denied (more on that later). So, off she went to New York Medical College for Women, a homeopathic institution that had just opened in New York City in 1863. This College was led by a remarkable woman, Dr. Clemence Sophia Lozier. The College initially had seven students including Ms. Stowe. The school interestingly had gender balance in its faculty complement from day one – 4 male and 4 female. Dr. Lozier served as the Chair of Diseases of Women and Children and as President of the College.

In 1867, Canada’s birthday, Dr. Stowe became the school’s first graduate. During a 25-year period this school graduated 219 students. They originated from states across America and included the first African American female MD in New York, Dr. Susan McKinney.

http://www.biographi.ca/en/bio/jennings_emily_howard_13E.html

The newly minted Dr. Stowe returned to Ontario at a propitious time, with Upper Canada (Ontario) having joined the Confederation of Canada in 1867. She began her practice (see advertisement, right) on Richmond Street in Toronto. Perhaps reflecting her view of the establishment, she began practice without a medical license!

Dr. Stowe encountered several types of men in her career, as I suspect do modern female practitioners. There were men she loved and men she loathed. There were men who actively opposed her and others who helped in key times in very instrumental ways. For example, she reported that John McCaul, president of University College in Toronto, was not content to merely reject her application to medical school. When she responded to her rejection notice by “… expressing my regret & at the same time remarking that these university doors will open some day to women”, Dr. McCaul reportedly replied “Never in my day Madam”.

In contrast some men she met were advocates and allies, helping open doors. For example, a few years later in 1870 it was a man, Dr. William Thomas Aikins, an Irish immigrant and president of the Toronto School of Medicine, who allowed Ms. Stowe and another woman, Jenny Kidd Trout, to attend medical school classes. For whatever reason Ms. Trout sat and passed the exams whilst Ms. Stowe did not. Thus, Jenny Trout became the first licensed female physician in Canada.

Why did Emily not sit the exams after taking the courses? According to the Canadian Dictionary of Biography the male professors’ and students’ behaviour “had so angered her that she would not sit the exams”. Perhaps she also had concerns about her background as a homeopath and having practiced medicine without a license!

The theme of resilience is strong in Dr. Stowe’s life. She continued her practice but once again met adversity. In 1879 she was charged with performing an abortion. At this point she seemed to have acquired the respect of many colleagues and the leadership of the medical community in Toronto (men) came to her defense, testifying to her skills.  She was vindicated. Out of this adversity came a surprising result in July, 1880: her acceptance with formal licensure by the College of Physicians and Surgeons. Once again, her advocate, Dr. Aikins, was among those who testified in her support.

In 1883 her daughter, Augusta Stowe-Gullen graduated from Medical school, continuing her legacy. Also, in 1883 the Toronto Women’s Suffrage Association, led by Dr. Stowe senior created the Ontario Medical College for Women.

Dr. Stowe was not simply a medical pioneer. She recognized the need to improve the life for all women, not just those who aspired to a career in Medicine. She became an ardent and effective feminist and advocate for woman’s rights.  In 1888, Dr. Stowe, after participating in an international suffragettes’ conference in Washington, D.C., brought the movement back to Canada, founding the Dominion Women’s Enfranchisement Association in 1889.

The messages that I take from the life of Dr. Stowe include:

  • Ambition accompanied by resilience is often able to overcome staggering odds.
  • Even the most resilient and ambitious person needs allies, and in the case of WIM some allies will likely be male.
  • Activism is required to advance causes and this involves personal engagement and sacrifice.
  • Medicine is just part of the broader play of life and for females to be accepted as physicians society must embrace feminism and address the related issue of equity.
  • If you want to effect social change surround yourself with like-minded colleagues (e.g. a WIM program), whether that cause is obtaining the vote for women, securing access to admission of women to medical school or equity in the modern work place.

So how is society doing with the issues of feminism and women in Medicine?  Certainly, better than in 1867!  However, inequities and bias persist. Since women vote, constitute the majority of the medical school class, are often leaders in academic health science centres and have (to variable extents) access to childcare and maternity leave, do we even need WIM programs? We took on this sensitive subject in the 2017 Travill Debate in which the proposition was “Be it resolved that a Women in Medicine Program is Not Needed in 2017”.

This debate series, like its namesake (Dr. Tony Travill), is provocative and candid. As one can imagine the Pro, assigned to Dr. Romy Nitsch and medical student Roya Abdmoulaie, argued WIM programs was tokenism – we don’t need special treatment. We are already equal! The Con, assigned to Dr. Joneja and medical student Daniel Huang, argued that women are still misidentified as nurses or support staff, treated with less respect than their junior male physician colleagues and on occasion subject to sexual harassment.

So how is our WIM program structured and what are its goals? The WIM program began with meetings attended solely by female faculty. The theme of meetings is simple: women supporting women in medicine.

The goals of our Women in Medicine program are to:

  • Promote the advancement and success of women in academic and leadership positions
  • Create a community of women in medicine to provide support and mentorship for one another
  • Provide a forum for the expression of appreciation of the women in the DOM who have made significant contributions
  • Achieve 50% female faculty in next 5 years
  • Achieve 50% female faculty in DOM Leadership positions in the next 7 years

WIM holds quarterly meetings and has an accredited journal club. Meetings are funded by the DOM’s professional development fund. There are 9 members of the WIM Planning Committee and meeting attendance averages ~21 members (~43% of the DOM’s female cadre). One can get a feel for the meetings by reviewing some of the Guest Presenters and Topics.

Click image above to view a video about the Women in Medicine Committee at the Department of Medicine

1st Annual Event:

  • Dr. Elizabeth Eisenhauer, Head of Oncology, Queen’s University – The first woman in Medicine’s perspective on leadership and career growth
  • Ms. Jennifer Valberg, Senior Communications Officer, Queen’s University– How networking at Queen’s and building a community can help Women in Medicine thrive.
  • Dr. Robyn Houlden, Chair of Endocrinology – The History of Women in Medicine at the DOM – a timeline
  • Dr. Jacalyn Duffin –Hannah Professor of the History of Medicine- History of the first female surgeon Dr. James Barry – Born Margaret Ann Bulkley)

2nd Annual Event:

  • Dr. Sue Moffat, Associate Professor of Medicine, Respirology –Lesson’s learned as one of the first Women in Medicine in the Department of Medicine.

While I have not attended the meetings so far, they are well received. Each annual event has seen approximately 25 female faculty members in attendance. Feedback on these events has yielded a 100% satisfactory rating from attendees. The WIM have indicated that they plan to make changes in their medical practice including, but not limited to:

  • An improved focus on work-life balance
  • A renewed approach to professionalism in medicine
  • Increased utilization and provision of mentorship for other women in medicine
  • Improved focus on creation of a network of supportive colleagues in which to rely on

We have made progress toward the goals of the WIM program. For example, all our search committees are reminded to consider equity in the search process. The Department of Medicine is committed to employment equity and diversity in the workplace and welcomes applications from women, visible minorities, indigenous people, persons with disabilities and persons of any sexual orientation or gender identity. Moreover, the hiring committee membership is broad, diverse, and extends beyond the division in which the new position resides. Quite importantly half of our leaders, Division Chairs, are female.

The following table shows how the Department of Medicine is faring in our march toward gender equity:

An example of the #whatadoctorlookslike campaign on leadership roles for women in medicine.

The Department of Medicine has recently launched a Twitter and Instagram campaign (@queensudom) for female faculty members using the #whatadoctorlookslike hashtag.  You can follow that hashtag to find out more about the leadership roles of women in the Department of Medicine.

 

So how are we doing nationally with the goal of having the number of women in Medicine reflect broader society? As of Jan 2018, the Canada Physician Data Centre reported Canada has 84,260 physicians (that is 2.30 physicians per 1,000 population). Women account for 42% of all physicians. However, the inclusion of women varies widely by the type of physician, being lower in specialty disciplines (true for of all types of specialties) than in general practice (37.8% female versus 45.9%) and lowest in surgical specialties (~29%). https://www.cma.ca/En/Pages/canadian-physician-statistics.aspx

https://www.cma.ca/Assets/assets-library/document/en/advocacy/06-spec-sex.pdf 

As past president of CAPM, the Professors of Medicine of Canada (the leaders of our Academic Department of Medicine) I can attest there is diversity in terms of the progress toward equity of the genders in our academic Departments of Medicine across the country. I performed a brief survey of our 13 Academic DOMs and received several responses listed below in graph format:

The above graph shows the percentage distribution of Female Faculty based on their role description as of March 2017 from participating Universities. As you can see, University one has 37% full time faculty an 36% part time faculty that were identified in the survey.

The above chart shows the allocation of female faculty members in leadership roles in Department, Faculty and Hospital levels.  As you can see, University 1 has 21% of female faculty members in Departmental Leadership positions but no faculty members in hospital or faculty level leadership positions.

 

The above graphs show a comparison between male and female faculty regarding associate and assistant faculty promotion within the first 7 years.  You will see that associate faculty promotion in University 1 saw a rate of 62% male faculty promotion while females saw 46%.  Data set for two entries were suppressed due to incorrect entry of data.

 

In the above graph you will see that 50% of faculties provide on-site daycare to their members.

 

In this graph you can see the distribution of female faculty members throughout divisions. For allergy, University number 5 (Orange) has 100% female faculty in that specialty.

Additionally, the survey revealed the rationale for declining leadership roles for female faculty across universities:

  • Family commitments
  • Work-life balance
  • Uncertainty of being successful in the role

 

In conclusion: In the era of Me Too we still need WIM programs. There are many issues we have yet to resolve such as:

  • How to provide 24-7 on-site daycare
  • How to support job sharing
  • How to deal with equity associated with providing flexible hours
  • How to cover maternity and parental leaves and more

We need safe spaces to have these conversations in a respectful manner. WIM programs constitute one such safe space. Indeed, I believe because conversations have become more “high stakes” in the current environment, we need WIM programs more now than pre-Me Too. WIM programs provide a forum for female physicians to shape policy, provide mentorship, and support one another, a collegium in which diverse opinions can be shared and pathways forward illuminated. As a Department Head, our WIM program provides me with advice on proposed policies, gaps and inequities informing my decisions with a perspective that I may lack. Rather than being confrontational I find having a vibrant WIM program empowers women, informs men and projects a sense of fairness that makes the DOM a better place to practice.


Thank you to Dr. Mala Joneja and my colleagues in CAPM for their contributions to this blog post.


Resources: 


Link to original post: http://deptmed.queensu.ca/blog/?p=1783


 

Posted on

“What Happened in Medicine?” Medical students ask Philadelphia

By Kelly Salman, photos by Rawy Shaaban, Queen’s medicine class of 2021

“The history quiz is due this weekend?!” a classmate pulled it up on his phone, while a few followed suit on laptops. We were waiting for the bus to take us to Philadelphia and while my peers debated the turbulent past of drug advertising, the rest of us talked about what we were excited to see. Many had plans for dramatic poses on the “Rocky steps” or near the Liberty Bell.

“What even is the liberty bell?” I shamelessly asked while googling the best spot to find cheesesteaks. The real reason we were heading over the border was for a history of medicine trip, the continuation of a long tradition for Queen’s Medicine students, one that started in 1996.

I can’t lie and say I’ve always appreciated history. Although I could fool you, or scare you, with my wide-eyed ramblings about how cool the plague must have been, history is an interest I’ve found late. But along my route to medicine, something romantic about the past has drawn me in, and I got the impression during this trip that I wasn’t alone. Perhaps it has something to do with entering a field that makes you take an oath to an ancient Greek guy, but as a group medical students seem somewhat enamoured with their own history.

Contrary to popular belief, history waits for no one, and we started our adventure early Saturday morning, coffees in hand. Pennsylvania Hospital was a great place to set the tone; I challenge anyone to sit in an old surgical amphitheatre and not get swept up in historical daydreams. It helped that our guide painted an incredible picture for us as we sat on elevated benches, peering down at a classmate sprawled out on the operating table. It’s the details that get you… for instance, the floor would have been covered in wood chips for soaking up, well, you can imagine. Or that the hospital opened its doors to those of the public curious to observe the spectacle. In a different life, I wondered, how many of us would have been in that audience.

We continued to a stately mansion, famous for housing a man modestly named “the Father of American Surgery”, or to his friends and family Dr. Philip Physick. The guide here had a slightly more blunt approach, but it fit with the narrative he was giving. As we perused Dr. Physick’s various inventions (surgical instruments and… soda), he told us about how uncommon it was for a patient to survive surgery in those early days of the field: “He tried some neurosurgery, but often ended up accidentally nicking a blood vessel and then it’s ‘you’re going to get very sleepy now’”. I left with the unsettling impression that surgery in the 18th century sounded a lot like making a recipe from scratch – trial and error.

If you’ve ever idly wondered what a slice of Einstein’s brain looks like, then the Mütter Museum is for you. So, basically everyone. It’s a medical smorgasbord, filled with oddities and ailments through time: atypical skeletons, preserved organs, a jar of human skin (why?!), and even a giant human colon. Perhaps more interesting was the history of how society responds to such anomalies, in an exhibit dedicated to the folklore and varied cultural attitudes surrounding birth defects across the world. No photos allowed, but check out their website for some extraordinary highlights!

As millennials we often forget what books look like, so it was a real treat to see the libraries. We marvelled at the mahogany grandeur of the Pennsylvania Hospital library, but my favourite was less insta-worthy (partly because pictures were ‘discouraged’). While half of the group looked through beautiful, hand-drawn anatomy pop-up texts, the rest of us were led along a meandering pathway through the College of Physicians of Philadelphia to a door reminiscent of a submarine airlock. We quietly filed into the largest collection of books I have ever set eyes on. It was a room of steel bookshelves, dusty and dimly lit, filled with medical literature and journals from the past. Peering through the holes in the floor, the stacks continued infinitely further down than my eyes, and frankly my brain, could comprehend. I tried to imagine all of the words below our feet, and thought it must be akin to what an astronaut feels looking back at the earth.

I know my words can’t compete with those of my medical ancestors hidden away in Philadelphia. But hopefully if you take anything from them, it’s an inkling of interest into the world behind us. Good and bad, whimsical, and downright gruesome at times, the history of medicine is incredibly important. Because, well, in the words of someone more eloquent than me “History never really says goodbye. History says ‘See you later.”

Oh and in case you were concerned, I did find time for a cheesesteak.

 

 

 

Posted on

Third annual History of Medicine Week starts April 23

The What Happened In Medicine (WHIM) Historical Society is proud to host the third annual History of Medicine Week! This year’s theme is inspired by Dr. Duffin’s Heroes & Villains assignment, where students must grapple with some controversial characters in our history. Students, Faculty, and Community members are all warmly welcomed to attend any and all events! Please join us during the week of April 23rd for four exciting events:

Museum of Healthcare Showcase 

Monday, April 23rd (8:30AM – 3:00PM)
Grande Corridor, New Medical Building, 15 Arch St.

Hero or Villain? You be the judge! Wander through the Grand Corridor of the New Medical Building and enjoy the showcase curated by the Museum of Healthcare. At your leisure, take a look at artifacts of some of history’s biggest medical heroes and villains.

Panel Discussion

Tuesday, April 24th (5:30PM – 7:30PM) 
132A, New Medical Building, 15 Arch St.
Don’t miss out on our most controversial event of the week! After a half hour period to gather refreshments and FREE food, a panel, moderated by the incredible Dr. Jenna Healey, resident Queen’s Hannah Chair of the History of Medicine, will question the basis for a designation of hero or villain. The panel will begin with Dr. Jaclyn Duffin, haematologist, historian, and past Hannah Chair of the History of Medicine, describing why and how she invented the Heroes and Villains project as an introduction both to history in medicine and to information literacy — with some of its triumphs and disasters. Next, Dr. Allison Morehead, Associate Professor and Graduate Coordinator of Art History at Queen’s University, will talk about Florence Nightingale and the “incursion” of women into the “fraternity” of medicine in the 19th and 20th centuries, as well as the ways in which historical accounts of Nightingale heroicize (or angelicize!) her to the exclusion of other figures in the history of nursing, such as Mary Seacole. Closing the panel is Edward Thomas, PhD candidate in Cultural Studies at Queen’s, will discuss his research examining Queen’s barring of black medical students between 1918 and 1964 in regards to how institutional narratives shape organizational memory and culture. 

Open Mic Night 

Wednesday, April 25th (7:00PM – 9:30PM)
The Grad Club, 162 Barrie St
Need an outlet for your historical arguments? Ready to re-enact your heroes and villain assignment? Want some free beer and endless historical entertainment? Come out to the Heroes & Villains: Open Mic Night! A relaxing event, some fantastic entertainment, and a wonderful evening spent with your Queen’s peers, what more can you ask for?!

Movie Night: History of Kingston Psychiatric Hospital

Thursday, April 26th (5:30PM – 7:30PM) 
032A, New Medical Building, 15 Arch St.

Don’t miss out on this weeks closing event! We will be screening the film “The History of KPH” by Queen’s Film Studies’ own Janice Belanger. Come to learn more about the Kingston Psychiatric Hospital, and have a relaxing end to this jam-packed week!

 

Posted on

Actors, musicians & dancers?? QMed is gearing up for the 48th annual Medical Variety Night!

{Italics indicates a hyperlink}

By Edrea Khong, MVN co-director

It’s that time of year again! Medical Variety Night (MVN) is the School of Medicine’s annual charity variety show featuring UGME student performers from across all four years of training. This year’s theme, So You Think You Can Match, was selected by popular vote amongst the students and is a spin on the popular television show, So You Think You Can Dance. The theme may be particularly apropos yet contentious right now, given the increasing difficulties surrounding the CaRMS match. However, while the show is sure to feature references to this, it certainly is not the focus. The spotlight will remain on the performers, and the show aims to celebrate all that is Queen’s Medicine.

Wandering the halls of the School of Medicine during after-class hours, one may be treated to a glimpse of the beautiful madness that is MVN preparation. From large group dance rehearsals for hip-hop, contemporary (new this year!), or Bollywood, to table-reads and short filming sequences for class skits, the students have been working tirelessly to perfect their acts for the show. The acts seem to get bigger and more elaborate each year, and this year’s line-up surely will not disappoint!

As always, details about the act set list are being kept tightly under wraps, but showgoers can be assured that there will be a great variety with something for

MVN 2018 Directors Edrea Khong, Daisy Liu, Emily Wilkerson, & Charlotte Coleman

everyone. In addition, although there will be some “medical culture”-styled humour, the show is designed to be accessible by and entertaining for all. In the past, the show has been very well attended by people outside of the “Medicine Bubble™” to rave reviews.

Outside of the performers, there are many others who have been hard at work on the show, such as the promotions, tech, and backstage crews already doing vital behind-the-scenes work in preparation. In addition, Edrea Khong and Daisy Liu (2020s) have been joined this year by Charlotte Coleman and Emily Wilkerson (2021s) as the MVN 2018 Directors. The four have spent countless hours since mid-September organizing and preparing for the show. With the two-week countdown now underway, they are hard at work ensuring the show runs as smoothly as possible. During the show week, many more students will also lend a hand as bakers, ushers, ticket takers, raffle sellers, and much more. MVN is a project of love, dedication, and talent from all of QMed.

MVN 2018 Emcees Roya Abdmoulaie & Lauren Mak

All proceeds from this year’s show are going to Kingston Interval House, an organization committed to supporting women, children, and youth experiencing violence and working collaboratively with the community to eliminate all forms of violence and oppression. While great strides have been made worldwide towards establishing greater equality especially in these past few months, there is still much to be done and services like these are so vital. The decision to support Kingston Interval House feels very apt. In addition to ticket sales, MVN depends on the generosity of the Kingston community and Queen’s faculty. Raffle prizes featuring local Kingston businesses and a bake sale featuring QMed culinary talent can be found at the shows. Donations are also being accepted on the MVN website, with donations of $50 or greater receiving a tax receipt.

MVN 2018 takes place on April 6th and 7th at Duncan McArthur Hall (511 Union St.), with doors opening at 6:30PM and the show starting at 7:00PM both evenings. Tickets can be purchased for $13 on the MVN website, or for $15 at the door.

Get excited for a fantastic evening of performances celebrating another year of Queen’s Medicine! Gather your family and friends and purchase your tickets to MVN 2018 today. Looking forward to seeing you at the show!

Posted on

The Evolution of SPs and The Standardized Patient & OSCE Program

Open House at Queen’s School of Medicine

Clinical Teaching Centre

Monday, March 26 from 1:00-4:00 pm

By Kate Slagle, SP & OSCE Program Manager

When I’m out in public and people ask what I do, I tell them what a standardized patient is which is typically met with a perplexed look to which my husband chimes in with, “Have you ever seen that episode of Seinfeld where Kramer works with the medical students?”

Although this parallel makes me slightly cringe they start to think about how standardized patients (SPs) — actors who are trained to convincingly portray the physical, historical and emotional features of a real person for educational purposes — can be applied across all fields.

For the past five years I have had the privilege of managing the Queen’s SP & OSCE Program and on a daily basis get to see the rewards SP simulation provides our students, such as:

  • Improved interviewing skills
  • Gained confidence in discussing difficult topics and de-escalating conflict
  • Empathy to deliver difficult news
  • Refined physical exam techniques and maneuvers
  • Next level, critical thinking
  • Constructive feedback and much more!

Over the past few years the request for SP encounters within the Faculty of Health Sciences has exponentially increased as well as interest from organizations outside the university. The time came when we had to ask ourselves, “What do we need to do to take our program to the next level and offer SP services outside the Faculty of Health Sciences?”

If we were going to expand we wanted to do things right. Over the past year we’ve been working with the university to formally expand the program to:

  • Continue to provide high quality SP sessions and work in partnership to develop new sessions within the Faculty of Health Sciences.
  • Offer SP services to the wider university and Kingston community.

The infrastructure is now in place and we’re ready to open our doors. The launch is set to begin this month with an open house for new and existing clients at the Queen’s School of Medicine Clinical Teaching Centre on Monday, March 26, 2018 from 1:00-4:00pm.

Although during the open house you won’t be hearing from Kramer, you’ll be able to hear from real SPs and learn more about what the program has to offer. We look forward to seeing you then.

Important Links

Facebook event link: https://www.facebook.com/events/155933065095723/

Queen’s Event Calendar Link: http://www.queensu.ca/eventscalendar/calendar/events/standardized-patient-osce-program-open-house

SP & OSCE Program Website: https://meds.queensu.ca/academics/spprogram

Video linkhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDd6vsmLhwg

The Burning” is the 172nd episode of the NBC sitcom Seinfeld. It aired on March 19, 1998.

 

 

Posted on

Five ways being a Geneticist helped me improve my teaching skills

By Andrea Guerin, Year 2 Director and Clinical Geneticist

Dr. Andrea Guerin

When growing up, the career choices offered are often dichotomous, do you want to be a lawyer or a firefighter, nurse or entrepreneur, doctor or teacher? In reality, most jobs are a blend of a few different skills. In medicine, doctors can be scientists, can run a business, and for most of us, being a teacher is a large part of our job. At first blush, being a Geneticist and a teacher doesn’t seem to have much in common, but my training in Medical Genetics has significantly influenced my role in education. Here are five examples I’d like to share:

  1. Words matter

Geneticists are wordsmiths. Language is very highly selected, “cause” not “reason”, “typical” not “normal” and “chance” not “risk”. The language I use with my patients is specific and inclusive, positive and hopefully, precise. Words are important, to convey meaning without an agenda, to educate without prejudice. I use the same thought in the classroom. I am mindful of the implicit biases that can be drawn from words. Words are powerful and their power needs to be recognized and headed.

Medicine is learning a new language. So is education. I’m not going to lie, I had never designed a small group session before coming to Queen’s and I certainly did not know what a Directed Independent Learning event was. When I came, I was disoriented, DILs, SGLs, RATs, GTAs. The terminology was overwhelming. But, like learning the language of medicine, I learnt the language of education too. We’ve added a few more in the past year in undergraduate medical education CBME, EPA, with only more to come.

  1. Technology is forever changing, but good ideas stand the test of time

When I started my residency 10 years ago the understanding of genetic testing was very different. Many tests were not available. Testing was laborious, going from gene to gene, with months of anxious anticipation in between. Now, a decade later, I can order a test that looks at all the necessary genes of the body that have a purpose. Results can be available more quickly. Interpretation is more of a challenge, as we learn more, it becomes more evident the gaps in our knowledge and tying findings to patient symptoms can be a challenge. The concept of having parents and environment contributing to the health of the child is an old one, with influences from Ancient Greece to India. This testing is a reinvention of an old idea — we have only identified the individual factors (genes) that support what has been seen for thousands of years.

When I went to medical school, problem based learning was new. Powerpoint was a staple of lectures. There were almost no laptops. We would never have thought to work in groups while in the same classroom. That was an activity reserved for afternoon sessions, segregated into rooms under the watchful eye of a faculty facilitator. Marks were given from formal assessments, not team assignments or readiness assessment tests. That’s not to say assessments were not happening, they were just less formalized. It was a gut feeling. Did the clinical skills tutor think you were professional? Did the small group facilitator see that you participated? Now, assessments, both summative and formative are happening all the time. The actual process has become more concrete and transparent, but the idea has not changed.

  1. It’s all developmental

Genetics is  one of only a few specialties where the patient population spans from before cradle to grave. When I see a patient with a concern, I endeavour to find out when it started. An understanding of development, both physical and emotional, is key to my practice. You must walk, before you run.

Education is no different. The expectation must be adjusted to where the student is in their education journey. It’s okay to not know the differential in the first year, but in fourth year, students must be equipped with the knowledge and expertise to generate a differential and initiate management. Expectations need to match where the learner is, just like my patients.

  1. No person is an island

Genetics is a team sport. In clinic, amongst clinician and researchers spanning the province, country or world, we work together to solve diagnostic mysteries and provide good patient care.

Education is the same. Teachers, admin support, education support, technical support and student support and feedback are essential to the teaching process. Behind every teacher, there is a team supporting them in their journey.

  1. Comfortable with the uncomfortable concept of unknowns

After years of education, I will never be done learning. There is always more to learn, and no physician, despite years of practice and experience knows everything. When I counsel patients I always raise the possibility of an unknown. A confusing result, a question left unanswered. There is no crystal ball.

Education continues to surprise me, but I am open to the concept of something new, unknown. Can we produce excellent physicians using different teaching methods? Of course we can. Each of my colleagues had different curricula, different forms of instruction. There is more than one way to teach — the “best way” is still unknown.

Posted on